Rules of Knowledge Workers -Introduction

There was a time when everyone put in an honest days labor, and earned an honest days wage. In most cases this meant spending the day in the factory, in the fields, or involved in some other physical labor, and it made sense. The longer you could harvest crops, or weld steel, the more physical work you accomplished and the more you should get paid for that work.

As we moved away from that sort of industrial economy an toward a more service economy, however, those same valuations may or may not make very much sense. Sure, these same ideas make perfect sense in a production environment, but for knowledge workers, I’m not sure they do.

In this series of blog posts, I want to look at a number of areas where labor management practices, by refusing to view the resource of labor as having fundamentally changed, are mishandling their employees. At the same time, I want to recognize that individuals, by misreading these sea changes, are mishandling their own careers, waiting for someone to tell them what to do, instead of taking charge for themselves.

As I do this, I do want you to note that I’m hardly an HR or labor expert. Rather, I’m just one guy who happens to work in a knowledge industry, and who has been trying to keep himself on the cutting edge of technology and see where the world is headed. Over the years, it’s become clear to me that while things are changing in the work world, not everyone is adapting well.

Also, before we get started in this discussion, many of the examples I will give are composite examples of stories I’ve experienced or heard from others. Any similarities to people, or employers, is pure coincidence.

As I post different ideas in this series, I will come back and update this post with links, so that this will become the “home” post in this series. With that said, let’s get right into the rules!

The Professional is Personal
The 40 Hour Illusion
It’s Your Career
Blocking is Somewhat Pointless

Similar Posts

  • Links (weekly)

    GoDaddy Faces boycott over SOPA support tags: Tech MM What Makes ILTA Social? Sharing At Conference And Implications For Knowledge Work tags: LitSupport MM Management Occupying the Trial Hot Seat tags: LitSupport MM EDRM Buyer’s Guide Part IV – Preservation tags: LitSupport MM Twitter and Technology-Assisted Document Review – the downside of uninformed prejudice tags:…

  • Linked – 6 Problems L&D Can’t “Out-train”

    I’ve also spoken to some in-house trainers who see this up close. People come to them because they lack some knowledge and hope the training will help them because their manager hasn’t given them clear direction. They don’t realize that they haven’t been getting a clear direction. They assume there is some skill or knowledge they are missing. Where do you go when there’s a skill you need? To Training and Development!

    But the trainer can’t give you that clear direction about your job. That has to come from your manager.

  • |

    Linked – Emails while commuting ‘should count as work’

    Not surprising: The study, to be presented at the Royal Geographical Society on Thursday, found that 54% of commuters using the train’s wi-fi were sending work emails. Others were using their own mobile phone connections for work emails. Those on the way to work were catching up with emails sent ahead of the coming day…

  • | |

    Linked – AI Agents Come For White Collar Jobs

    How often have we watched a C-level person from Microsoft remind us that AI will not take our jobs but help us do our jobs better? It was there to assist us, not work for us.

    “It’s even in the name, Copilot.”

    When I heard them talk about agents being our team members and eventually managing other agents and their tasks, I immediately thought this was no longer a copilot. If it’s a team member, that means fewer human team members to do the work.

  • Interesting discussion

    A rather interesting piece that I came across over the weekend over at Adam Barr’s blog has had me thinking quite a bit about the term IT Generalist and the “persona” created by Microsoft’s marketing department. The first thing that popped into my head after reading it, and all the comments, is that some of…

  • Do You Know Why Employees Leave? Do You Know Why They Stay?

    My point isn’t to toot my own horn. It’s to give you a concrete example of what a difference sitting and talking to your employees can make in terms of understanding what works for them, or doesn’t work for them in the workplace. A survey has a purpose, especially when you realize that meeting one on one with all of your employees doesn’t scale very far. If you really want to know what’s going on, though, don’t wait for someone to leave so you conduct an exit interview. A stay interview might prevent them from leaving in the first place.

    And for god’s sake, conduct exit interviews too, and be willing to act on them. These people are telling you what went wrong, why wouldn’t you want to know that?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)