Facebook Community Pages Even Worse for Marketers

Yesterday I wrote about how the new community pages feature of Facebook made my profile less useful because it now links to a community page for various things in my profile, like the place I work, that doesn’t exist. Not being in marketing it didn’t occur to me today until I saw someone else talking about it, but for marketing folks, this is kind of a nightmare.

If you go to my profile, or hundreds of other profiles, on Facebook, there’s a link to a company’s page, but the page doesn’t exist. However, anyone who visits that page can “link” it to either the Wikipedia entry for that company, or whatever they decide to suggest as the “official” site for that company. Assuming that someone is actually checking the suggestions, do you know what information will get pulled from your website, or what information there is about your company on Wikipedia? So, whether you wanted a Facebook page for your business or not, you’ve got one now, and you may not even be the one controlling it.

Not only that, but for each potential way an employee refers to their workplace, there’s a different page! For instance, Kraft is one page, Kraft, Inc. would be another, and so on, and so on. Yes, that’s just awesome for law firms, which are commonly referred to many different ways, eh?

So, if your marketing strategy didn’t include having a Facebook community page for your business, too freakin’ bad for you. Facebook decided your strategy for you. Good luck with that.

Of course, I can see some businesses deciding that the best way to handle this is to forbid any employees from listing their workplace on Facebook, which would be a poor choice. But even then, how do you stop former employees from listing it? What leverage do you have? Somewhere, womehow, someone is going to list you in their profile, and you’ll have a page. Get used to it.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Linked – Top 10 Ways to Stay Safe From Scams This Holiday Season

    It’s never a bad thing to stay safe online, but the holidays offer a time when hackers and others know that you might have your guard down, or be doing a bit more online shopping than usual. Given that, here’s an article with some good advice on staying safe! http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/ways-stay-safe-scams-holiday-season/ Follow these topics: Links, SocialNetworking,…

  • |

    Linked – The Neuroscience of Trust

    There is quite a lot to think about in this article about Trust, and how important it is to employee engagement. What isn’t mentioned, but is easy to infer, is if the company has broken trust, a half-day employee meeting about a focus on trust isn’t going to improve things. So if you’ve not kept…

  • |

    Watch Out For Phone Calls Claiming Your Computer is Infected

      Since I’ve recently seen a couple of Facebook friends mentioning the fact that they’ve gotten unsolicited phone calls claiming that their computer was at risk, and infected with malware, I thought I’d go ahead and make a public service announcement about it. Do not give out any personal information, or download software that allows…

  • Would you Pay to use Twitter?

    Tim leaves out of his analysis accounting for how many users will no longer be there and how that much smaller user base impacts the value proposition. If I’m a journalist using Twitter to interact with readers and attract new readers to my publication, the ROI of paying for a fully-featured Twitter account includes considering how many people it helps me reach. Is it still worth it when my 250,000 followers get cut to 25,000? What about 2,500? What about less?

    Before you dismiss that as unlikely, I’d like you to remember that recent Pew research found that “the top 25% of users by tweet volume produce 97% of all tweets, while the bottom 75% of users produce just 3%, according to an analysis conducted over a three-month period in 2021.”

    I’m going to just assume that the 75% group who isn’t tweeting very often is not going to pay for Twitter. Of the other 25% we have to consider how many of them will fall into the $12 per year plan because they already don’t follow many people but use Twitter to interact with people who want to follow them. The question is, will those followers still exist? And if they don’t exist, is Twitter still a global conversation? Or is it just another place for privileged people who pay for membership to talk to each other?

  • |

    Linked – Bring Back the Chronological Internet

    I’m barely a Snapchat user, but this comment reminds me of what Instagram recently did as well. Nothing really makes sense in the main app now, it’s only in Stories that the timeline makes any sense at all. “Because I am not a teen and have not been for several years, Snapchat’s interface has always…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)