Manager sign held by a hand
|

Linked: These Simple Changes to Your Performance Reviews Will Make More Effective Employees

The whole article is full of good advice, if not advice that should be obvious, like this:

“Rather than conducting employee performance reviews once or twice a year, tweak them so that they happen weekly or monthly, and so that they’re a more informal event. “

Unfortunately, even though it seems obvious that only offering feedback on someone’s performance once or twice a year means not getting adjustments and helping people be better in real time, I know that is still the norm, and it is also still the norm that employees will get completely sucker-punched at the end of the year with criticism that they’ve never heard before, rather than having had the chance to correct it before the yearly pay-raise was in question about it.

It makes no sense. Provide feedback, positive and negative, in real time. It’s not rocket-science. It’s basic education.

https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/359711

Similar Posts

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly) – June 7, 2020

    Virtual Meetings Could Be Fertile Ground For Legal Discovery Sanction Offers a Warning on Courtroom Tech Savvy Meet the Hacker Groups Snatching Law Firms’ Client Data Companies are rushing to reopen their offices. Here’s what they’re getting wrong Strengthening Diversity & Inclusion in E-Discovery in a Post-Pandemic World “Right Fit” Document Review Technology How to…

  • |

    Linked – Time to Talk About Emotional Labor

    Words about your workplace’s great culture ring hollow when team members regularly find themselves putting up with jerks. That’s not a great culture. That’s extra emotional labor—labor that likely doesn’t come close to matching what they are paid.

    We don’t talk about this in terms of emotional labor. We talk about being resilient, staying composed, etc. We don’t talk about how exhausting it is to know that every day at work, someone is likely to yell at you, let alone know that when it happens, there will be no solution to prevent it from happening again. If they take the time to complain and ask for a solution, they’ll be told it’s “just part of the job.”

  • |

    Linked – Dear Bad Marketers – Stop It

    Pretty much going to agree with everything Chris Brogan says here, because even on my little corner of the web, I get these emails. Just the other day I got one. This person literally sent a link to a post I wrote 13 years ago about downloading the first service pack for Office 2003 or…

  • What I’m Reading (weekly)

    Is Deletion of a Key Document After Notice Spoliation | The Legal Intelligencer tags: LitSupport MM Twitter Isn’t about News, Tweets or Even You Anymore tags: MM SocNetPres The 10 Most Important Legal Technology Developments of 2014 tags: MM LitSupport Your biggest online security mistakes (and how to avoid them) tags: MM Security Posted from…

  • Kroll ESI Trends Survey

    Despite the fact that we’ve been talking about electronic discovery, and the FRCP were changed 4 years ago to account for eDiscovery, apparently things are still a mess out there in the real world, according to the 2010 ESI Trends Survey from Kroll: Seventy-seven percent of companies are not confident in the repeatability and defensibility…

  • This Week’s Links (weekly)

    Brace yourselves for the best WordPress yet tags: Blogging MM Technology Assisted Review – The Gavel Has Sounded tags: LitSupport MM Good Processing Requires a Sound Process – eDiscovery Best Practices tags: LitSupport MM “Big-A-Law — Y U No Collapse Already?” tags: LitSupport MM Courts Struggle With Determining Reasonability of e-Discovery Vendor Bills tags: LitSupport…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)