Man in shadow of large screen
|

Congressional Think Tank Sees the Problem with Age Verification – Members Not so Much

Thanks to Techdirt I learned yesterday that the Congressional Research Service, which exists to study and inform Congress about the impacts of potential laws, has some issues with making all social media users verify their age.

We all should have some issues with it.

Among the issues we should have are the obvious, there’s a First Amendment that says we all have the right to free speech. Can the government limit the ability of minors to speak online? There are also the massive privacy implications of requiring everyone to verify who they are. Do we really want to give social media platforms driver’s licenses and other ID information? Really? We can’t trust them to handle that information securely. If anything they have already proven that the one thing we can trust them to do is sell any personal information they have about users.

The CRS also identifies another concern, what’s the standard? Is it a driver’s license? How do teens without one prove their age? What kind of facial recognition system can be trusted to compare a face with the photo on an ID? We know that facial recognition systems can struggle with certain kinds of faces, especially non-white ones. How do we design a fool-proof system that keeps kids away but allows all adults to without error?

It’s not that easy. I’d also add one more. Proving your identity and your age eliminates the ability for anyone to remain anonymous. You might argue that is a good thing, but I’ll take the opposite side. There are plenty of reasons for someone to remain anonymous online, and why we’d be worse off eliminating that. Whistleblowers, political dissidents of fascist governments, victims of childhood and spousal abuse, people dealing with mental health issues, women, the LGBTQ community, and many others have legitimate reasons to fear being identified. Do we want to eliminate them all from the public space?

Sadly, I suspect that some of us do. This will only help them reach that end online, all in the name of “protecting the children” from something that isn’t that much of a danger at all.

Similar Posts

  • Worth Reading – Your ‘Culture’ is a Lie Until You Fund Mental Health

    The culture you describe would be working toward solutions to the epidemic of burnout and anxiety. Especially the stress that results from financial instability, caregiving responsibilities, and discrimination, to name a few. A good workplace culture addresses these issues by providing a living wage, flexibility, and equal opportunities, among other benefits related to quality mental health care. 

    An app doesn’t show that you care, and if you don’t care, you have no culture. 

  • Can Someone Explain Foursquare to me?

    OK, so I’ve seen all the “experts” talking about how Foursquare is going to be the next big thing, and I’ve seen other folks using it, and looked at what it is, and how they’re using it, and I’m just not seeing the point. Oh I see the point for commercial opportunities, isn’t having all…

  • |

    Trending Topics That Might Not Be

    “The trending news section is run by people in their 20s and early 30s, most of whom graduated from Ivy League and private East Coast schools like Columbia University and NYU. They’ve previously worked at outlets like the New York Daily News, Bloomberg, MSNBC, and the Guardian. Some former curators have left Facebook for jobs…

  • Shared Links (weekly) Feb. 7 2021

    For U.S. businesses, less data is more than ever

    The Future Of Mental Health And Career Support For Remote Workers

    No, Getting Rid Of Anonymity Will Not Fix Social Media; It Will Cause More Problems

    I cannot stress this enough, getting rid of anonymity does nothing to stop harassing (look at Facebook?), and only hurts already marginalized people.

    eDiscovery Tug of War: A Breakdown of the In-House vs. ALSP Debate, Part Two

    Defensible Deletion: The Proof Is in the Planning

    Microsoft launches Microsoft 365 for Legal

    How to ensure mental wellbeing policies genuinely work for employees

    The ethical quandary of being a social media manager in 2021

    Strong stuff from Tim Cook

    “What are the consequences of seeing thousands of users joining extremist groups and then perpetuating an algorithm that recommends even more?”

    New ESI Sanctions Order Offers E-Discovery 101 Course for Lawyers

  • Google+ Communities

    Thiss seems like an interesting idea Just saw the Google announcement about communities and it has sparked a few ideas for ways to use them rolling around in my head. Especially for the Child Abuse Survivor site, but also for this site and some other things. How about you guys, are you excited about the…

  • | |

    Linked: How to Use RSS Feeds to Boost Your Productivity

    RSS is not gone, quite the opposite. Most people, however, don’t use RSS subscriptions like they did in the old Google Reader days, but RSS is running underneath a whole lot of stuff that we all use every day.

    But, I also want to point out that there are a TON of good reasons to use an RSS reader now. Maybe more than there were when Google still had one. As it is, we’ve sort of grown into this habit of letting social media inform us. If there’s some topic we want to know about, we’ll follow some accounts and let the algorithm decide for us what we need to see.

    Look how well that’s working out.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.