Meeting Discussion

How Much of Working in Startup Tech is a Scam?

Earlier this week I posited that the tech industry specifically, but all industries in some way, are playing the wrong game and causing everyone who works there to be stuck in a quagmire.

I’m not the only one looking at this industry and wondering why anyone works here.

On a recent episode of Work Appropriate, host Anne Helen Petersen had a guest, Ifeoma Ozoma, who had previously worked at Google and Pinterest. She pulled no punches in talking about the industry and answering questions from workers.

First off, let’s be honest. The reality of working in tech is no different than other industries. They talk about how being in Big Oil, Big Pharma, or at a place like Goldman’s your life is hell but you knew that going in. In tech, we aren’t honest about it. We tell people things are different in tech. We’re special. We don’t even need HR departments, because we’re so special and the work we are doing is so innovative and important.

It’s not that innovative or important.

Working in tech is no different than working in other big industries. Working in small startups is just a miniature version of the same thing. We’re innovating so fast, and you’re an important piece of that speed so don’t worry about employment laws, just “dig in” to the work.

It all sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

A couple of other areas where the scam shows up were also covered.

1. Many workers don’t do anything to change the workplace or hold billionaire owners accountable because they think they are one job away from being a billionaire themselves. Both Anne and Ifeoma pointed out that you don’t become a billionaire through a job. Ifeoma even points out that unless you own the company, you are a worker. Too many people in tech think they are going to get rich when the company goes public or gets purchased, but again, if you don’t own a significant part of the company, you will not be getting rich. As they were discussing this point I couldn’t help but think about all the people who are against things like tax increases for billionaires because they think they will be one someday. Workers don’t push for change because they think they’ll be the ones running things one day and don’t want to make it harder on themselves. The tech industry sends this message, that we’re all one good idea away from striking it rich and being the next Zuckerberg or Musk. Nah, they had a lot of help most of us will never get.

2. The promotion scam also makes an appearance in this episode. You know the one. To qualify for the next job on your career path, you need to be doing that job. Which is really just doing a job you’re not being paid to do, for as long as “they” think they can get away with it. That one bugs me personally because I’ve worked in places where you couldn’t even get an “exceeds expectation” grade in an annual review unless you were at least partially “doing the next job”. It didn’t much matter that you weren’t being paid to do that job, or that there may not have even been an opportunity to do it. You would never be more than just an acceptable employee without it.

Again, this is a practice that has grown outside of the tech industry too.

Check out the episode. There’s some interesting discussion. Sadly, even when asked for something positive to end on, the guest had nothing. That’s kind of what working in tech feels like, doesn’t it?

Update – Later in the day I came across some similar thoughts by Ed Zitron on how the tech industry views itself and how we hold founders on underserved pedestals.

You are not the Man in the Arena

 

Similar Posts

  • |

    Linked: How long your meetings should last

    We aren’t strategic about meetings. We don’t plan for the meeting enough, we schedule the meeting in order to plan. We should start planning before the meeting, and figure out what we want from the other folks before we invite them, and tell them. Those of us who think more creatively by ourselves ahead of meeting with others will also bring much more to the meeting when you share the agenda and expectations ahead of time too.

    If you take anything away from this, remember that it’s OK to not invite everyone to every meeting, and it’s OK to use all of the other tools we have to collaborate instead of having a meeting.

    Your calendar will thank you.

  • It’s a Global Economy and a Global Talent Pool For Many Remote Workplaces

    I find it interesting that the same people who only want to hire “the most qualified” person also want to limit themselves to hiring only people who live in the vicinity of their office and are physically able to be in the office 8-10 hours per day, five days a week. It seems that leaves out many talented people who might be better qualified. Can your company compete with just that labor pool in a global economy when others search the world for talent?

    If foreign companies poach American workers to work remotely, they might know something you don’t.

  • |

    Google Plus Rolls Out Pages, Still No RSS Import

    Before I made any comments about Google Plus’ new Pages feature, I wanted to take a look for myself. So I created a page for my website.Feel free to add it to your circles if you’re interested. The first obvious lacking feature, much like the most obvious lacking feature of Plus in general, is the…

  • Does Remote Work Make It Obvious Who is Getting Work Done?

    Regarding technology flattening the organization, I would agree with Ed. Where I’m going to disagree is in assuming every workplace has figured that out and taken advantage of it. 

    Bad managers are still bad managers, even if they are remote. If the management style at your company is to measure work by, what Ed calls, the “appearance of work”, you’ve probably struggled with remote work. Or, you’ve got everyone in meetings, or at least available online all day, every day. On the other hand, if you’ve switched to remote work and also switched the way you measure your directs, you’ve probably been very successful and might even be willing to accept remote work permanently. It’s all about understanding that what we do with teams when they work in-person doesn’t work with remote teams and adjusting. 

    Remote work isn’t compatible with management that measures workers by the hours they spend at their desks or how many people like you. Those measurements kind of go out the window. So it would be best if you had new, better measurements. I’d argue that you need the measurement you should have always been using, but I digress. 

  • Linked – Reimagining The Employee-Employer Deal

    This is the power that more and more employees realize they have. To hire you as an employer and to fire you when you no longer fit their needs. If that bothers you, if that offends your sense of loyalty to the workplace, do me a favor. Go to Google News and search for “layoff”. Do a little light browsing and tell me what loyalty has to do with anything.

  • |

    Linked: You Don’t Need to Meet Every Qualification to Apply for a Job

    I see this often, in young people just starting out, and plenty of people who’ve been around a bit longer and should know better. They look at a job posting, and find the one thing that rules them out, instead of seeing the bigger picture. Practically speaking, it’s useful for almost everyone to treat job…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)