Trust

Linked – The wrong way to define productivity

This seems like a pretty big disconnect:

Microsoft research shows 87% of employees say they’re productive, while only 12% of leaders are confident saying the same of their teams.

But maybe this is the biggest reason for that disconnect:

And since “productivity” in knowledge work is notoriously hard to define, the majority of leaders are defaulting to visible signals of inputs, not outcomes. Recent Slack research shows while productivity is the number-one concern for executives, 60% of their productivity metrics are activity-based: emails sent, hours worked.

As the article mentions, this is a big reason why return-to-office mandates have destroyed the trust between management and employees. When I’m happily working remotely, finishing all of my tasks and projects on time, connecting with the people I need to collaborate with just fine, and reporting on the status of my work using the tools available, and you turn around and tell me that I need to be in the office to be more productive, I quickly see that for what it is. Despite the results, you don’t trust people to do their jobs.

Not only do you not trust us, but you also have no idea what our jobs are. Do you think seeing us in the office after 5 PM equals productivity? It doesn’t. In fact, I recently came across this statement I made in a post a couple of years ago that I find very applicable:

If I don’t work 50-60 hours per week, but still complete the same amount of work that Joe and Sally take 60 hours per week to do, that makes me a more valuable employee, not a less dedicated one.

When you suggest that I’m not as dedicated, that destroys any trust we may have ever had. I often wonder what message these employers assume that they are sending when they reward and recognize not the people who get the most done but the ones who take the longest to do the work because the people on your team down in the trenches doing the work know who is getting things done and who is filling a seat for long hours. They no longer trust you, and you’ve made it clear that you don’t trust them.

If you want to talk about a good way to cause more turnover, quiet quitting, and disengaged workers, this would be the way.

Maybe you could figure out how to measure the things that matter instead.

https://www.charterworks.com/productivity-trust-brian-elliott/

Similar Posts

  • Linked – You Can’t Make Friends With The Rockstars

    That seems to be what happens in the tech journalism space. We have a list of people who’ve created successful companies and made a ton of money doing it, and everyone is supposed to assume that they are so bright they can do it over and over again. Then we are surprised when Elon buys Twitter and runs it into the ground or when Meta can’t find a market for the Metaverse. Microsoft spends billions upon billions of dollars on AI without any hope of making a profit for years while conducting rounds of layoffs to offset those costs. We assume they know what they’re doing because they’ve succeeded in other markets before, and the press doesn’t challenge them when they say provably false things. 

    It’s the Halo Effect. We assume that successful people are smart and kind and live healthy lives, especially if they are white men. When they contradict this picture we’ve painted, we loathe to admit it, let alone call it out in an interview. It’s more cognitively comfortable for us to continue believing they are competent and will figure it out.

  • |

    Linked: What Does It Mean to Be a Manager Today?

    This is what employees are looking for, and it is what they respond to. If you plan on leading people in the workplace, you had better care about them as people, and have the ability to show them that. Anything less will jeopardize what kind of engagement you will get from them.

  • |

    IT People Fix Things

    We can’t help it. It’s in our nature to fix things that are broken. That’s what attracted us to working with technology in the first place. More than likely we started out troubleshooting, seeing how things worked and understanding what was wrong so that we could fix it, or maybe even improve upon it. That’s…

  • Maybe Apple Was Right All Along?

    Granted, more data needs to be collected, but if early indications are correct from Microsoft’s study of over a million PC failures it would appear that Apple’s strategy of not letting anyone build their own box, tweak their own hardware, and limiting who can actually build the hardware, id definitely the reason why it is…

  • Reaction to Death of Rondale Moore and Workplace Mental Health

    This is not just an issue for the NFL or other sports leagues. This is the reality in EVERY workplace. People ask all the time why no one talks about mental health at work, even when you have programs designed to support your employees. This is why. It’s the way everyone else in the workplace looks at them, talks to them, avoids them, and treats them differently than they did before they said anything. 

  • In Change Management, do you Skip the Unlearning Phase?

    Change is hard. It is also neverending. Things change. The new technology provides new opportunities. Leaders should take responsibility to explain that to their people and highlight the opportunities that change can provide. Show them how it will benefit the business.

    Then send them to training ready to learn.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)