2000 Bloggers

I haven’t spoken about this, I am on the 2000 Bloggers collage. I joined and purposely didn’t say anything because I saw it as a sort of sociological experiment, and I didn’t want to do anything to influence it.

As it turns out, my original theory was that being one face in a collage of 2000 would be a bit like being lost in a crowd. Faced with seeing 2000 photos of bloggers, very few people, if any, would manage to click on any particular link. I likened it to walking into a room filled with 2000 random people. Most people would gravitate toward someone they were already familiar with, or someone they found ridiculously attractive. Given that my picture wasn’t going to get me to the latter group, and most people who know me and my blog are already reading, I figured there would be absolutely no increase in traffic due to being on the collage. I was right.

Why tell you this now? Because I never even considered that the project would get reposted all over the place and might come into question as a way to “game” Technorati. Of course, the creator says he never thought about it either, but there it is.

So, if you happen to notice my photo on there, that’s the explanation. If I get punished by Google or Technorati for being part of a “link-farm”, so be it. I got what I wanted out of the experiment, my intellectual curiosity has been sated. 🙂

Update: My other theory was validated literally minutes after posting this, when a few people found this entry searching Technorati for 2000 Bloggers. Obviously, talking about it would have invalidated the experiment. 🙂

Tags: 2000Bloggers, Technorati

Similar Posts

  • |

    What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    Google Has a Plan to Disrupt the College Degree?This is pretty interesting, could work, if we can get orgs to see it as “qualified”. Would open a ton of doors.
    Toward a Zoom agreement?”The purpose of a meeting is not to fill the allocated slot on the Google calendar invite. The purpose is to communicate an idea and the emotions that go with it, and to find out what’s missing via engaged conversation. If we can’t do that, let’s not meet.”
    Report: AI Company Leaks Over 2.5M Medical Records
    The Intersection of E-Discovery and Cybersecurity: You’ve Come a Long Way, Baby
    Think You Don’t Need to Preserve Slack Data for Discovery? Think Again
    There is No Such Thing as a Free Lunch in Legal Tech
    Non-Lawyer Ownership Doesn’t Guarantee More A2J?The $$ barrier to entry for someone to even be a lawyer guarantees legal services will always be expensive. #A2J will require systemic changes.
    5 Best Password Managers of 2020
    Surveys Show Technology Is The Key To Law Firm Success During COVID-19 And Beyond
    Minimize The Risk of Data Loss From Departing Employees With These Simple Checklists

  • | |

    Linked – Laremy Tunsil slides in draft after bong video posted on Twitter

    This situation tonight is something that shows the real danger of hacking. We all know what kind of havoc can be created when someone steals your personal information, but here it’s not just someone gaining access to information about this kid, it’s someone getting into the account and planting information. That’s the real danger in…

  • Random Tech notes

    I installed Miranda IM the other day. I liked the fact that I could connect with Google Talk, which I can’t do with the free version of Trillian, but I wasn’t realy excited about the fact that there’s no voice features, which would be kinds nice to have with GoogleTalk. I also just didn’t like…

  • |

    RIP My Old iPad 2

    Naturally, because this is the way with technology, my iPad 2 died while I was traveling recently. I went to fire it up on a flight to San Francisco and nothing but the Apple logo. OK, I had read they sometimes this happens and it can be restored by connecting it to a PC with…

  • Further Thoughts

    I was thinking last night for a little bit about that EULA for Windows 2000 SP3, and some things occurred to me that I hadn’t thought of before. Now I’ll probably get flamed like hell for saying this, but after I got over the original knee-jerk reaction, I could see why Microsoft is doing this….

  • | | | |

    Kurt Leafstrand Gets It

    On the e-discovery 2.0 blog yesterday at least, he gets what I’ve been saying about social media in regards to legal risks, there’s not much that’s new here: There’s talk of intellectual property being cast out, irrevocably, onto the Internet for all to see. Or slanderous things being uttered for which your company may be…

4 Comments

  1. I don’t believe this is a serious enough issue for them to start blacklisting people. On the other hand, part of why I don’t do advertising or try to make money on this site is because I want to be able to say whatever, take part in whatever, and not worry about the almighty Google ranking. While I certainly get plenty of search traffic to the blog, it’s the folks who are regular readers, and not using Google, that I want to be applicable to.

  2. I’m in there too Mike, and honestly didn’t submit my blog/picture. I’d be surprised if it gets treated as a link farm.

    BTW, thanks for the linkblog inclusion today.

    Steve

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)