Twitter
| |

Linked: Twitter to ask some users to click link to article before retweeting

I can get behind this, sharing without reading is a huge problem, so why not nudge people to read it before they share it?

“Twitter Inc. will prompt some users to click links to other websites before retweeting them, part of an effort to discourage the spread of misinformation and foster more thoughtful communication on its social network.

“Sharing an article can spark conversation, so you may want to read it before you Tweet it,” the company said in a tweet Wednesday. ”

Right now, they’re only doing this in the Android app as a test. I also get that sometimes you’ve already read the article and retweet it without clicking on that link in Twitter, so I’m cool with letting people click through that and send the tweet anyway.

I don’t know that it’ll get anywhere, but whatever Twitter decides to do, read the article before you share it. The headline might just not truly reflect what you’re reading.

Case in point: I recently shared an article on my other site and the headline captured in sharing it was this:

Coronavirus, police violence boost risks of rising black youth suicide

Now, I shared the article because it was a really good, informative, look at the increase in suicide rates for black youth relative to other groups. It had some individual stories, some statistics to back up it’s claim, and what some groups have been trying to do about it since those statistics were released in 2019. There was a small mention that the rates have probably increased due to these recent events, but by and large, the increase has been going on for years. The headline doesn’t reflect that at all. It reflects an effort to use current events to get people to click and share and article that is only tangentially related to current events. If you saw it in a tweet and shared it thinking you were sharing an expose on current events, well, you’d be wrong.

But at least that was a good article worth sharing anyway, even if the headline misrepresents it. How many articles are you sharing that don’t fit that description?

https://fortune.com/2020/06/10/twitter-read-before-you-rt-click-link-retweeting-stop-misinformation-jack-dorsey/

Similar Posts

  • |

    Linked: Is the 4-day workweek a ‘perfect recipe for burnout’?

    Pre-2020 we spent 8+ hours in the office, plus maybe an hour or more commuting, turning our workday into about 10-11 hours of our day, on average. But, as I mentioned, part of that was just commuting, and part of that in-office time was spent interacting socially with coworkers, going to get lunch, etc. Now? We wake up and start working. (If you’re lucky and plan you might even get a chance to shower before work.) You eat at your desk. You work right up until 5-6PM and you simply shut down. Again, you’re lucky if someone doesn’t still email or “ping” you after that. So, for many of us, our workday might still be 10-11 hours, or it might even be a bit shorter, but it’s ALL work, and as we just saw, the reality is that around the 6-hour mark our productivity started to dip. The key then, to not burning out, is to make that day flexible. Instead of demanding you put in “x” hours each day/week/month, we should simply lay out what work needs to be completed, what the deadlines are, and give workers the freedom to find the best way to accomplish that. Maybe, for some, they will want to really focus for 4 days per week and have the extra day to live their lives. For others, it might look like working some in the morning, some in the afternoon, and then again in the evening. Not everyone is going to fit into the same bucket when it comes to finding the balance that allows them to do their best work, and also have a life. Don’t force them to fit into the bucket you like. That’s how you burn them out.

  • Links (weekly)

    Secrets of Search – Part III tags: LitSupport MM The Three Most Common Ways to Over-Process Your Images -Seven by Five tags: Photography MM 7 eDiscovery Predictions for 2012 tags: LitSupport MM eDiscovery and the Lawyer’s Duty of Competence tags: LitSupport MM The Case for In-House eDiscovery tags: LitSupport MM Social networking accounts for 1…

  • | |

    One Week Later…

    I just looked at my site, actually in the process of searching for something I had the foresight to blog about because I knew I’d need those details again, and realized I haven’t posted anything in a week. Heck, I’ve barely posted anything to Twitter or Facebook either! You might be wondering just what the…

  • |

    Linked – App notifications are tricking you to click by exaggerating numbers in your alert badges

    Look, everyone knows that when you see a notification on your phone, curiosity is going to kick in, that’s why many of us change the default settings to only alerting us to the things that are really important, of course that just means they’ll keep changing the game: I know I’m constantly finding myself with…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)