|

Linked – How to Retain Your Best Employees

ByMike McBride Reading Time: 1 minute

“Be Clear in Your Communication: You always have to be transparent when communicating with your employees. Even if the news are bad, you should still clearly talk with your employees and explain them what is going on within the company. Create time to listen to your employees’ concerns and do your best to solve them. Keep an open channel of communication and get their feedback when necessary.”

This is the big one for me. The others are important, but this is the one I can’t live without in a job. It’s difficult to feel valued when you don’t even know what is going on, and when you have remote employees, they have to be kept in the loop, or they will feel utterly disconnected from the company, which will lead to them leaving.

How to Retain Your Best Employees | Personal Branding Blog – Stand Out In Your Career

Similar Posts

  • |

    Linked – Who should be responsible for cybersecurity?

    ByMike McBride Reading Time: 1 minute

    I mean, naturally: “Clearly cybersecurity is everybody’s problem.” If you have access to anything that is not publicly available inside and outside of your workplace, then you have some responsibility for keeping it secure. Creating a workplace atmosphere that recognizes that reality is the job of the most senior management. Otherwise, you’ll have a whole…

  • | |

    Linked: The Third Web

    ByMike McBride Reading Time: 2 minutes

    Here’s the thing. I’ve been around the internet, and the Web, a long time. Long enough to remember when HTML was going to “democratize” publishing and when blogging was going to “democratize journalism” and when social media was going to be the thing that finally “democratized” the Web and gave everyone a voice.

    None of that proved to be true. Each and every iteration of Internet technology eventually wound up with a couple of big winners, and some sort of monopoly.

    What is it about Web3 that makes people think this will end any differently?

  • |

    Linked: The remote work revolution hasn’t happened yet

    ByMike McBride Reading Time: 2 minutes

    What they argue for instead is a decentralization of our work. That rather than being the center of our lives and our time, work is simply a transaction. We give you output, you pay us. That’s it. It’s all there is.

    That’s the revolution they are looking for. It might seem like a simple change, but it’s actually quite a different way to look at the world of work. Go read more and listen to the episode. It’s interesting to consider.

  • Links (weekly)

    ByMike McBride Reading Time: 1 minute

    When Good Enough – Isn’t | Jeffrey Brandt tags: LitSupport MM Google “Vaults” Into eDiscovery Preservation tags: LitSupport MM Traveling Thursday – State Department Resources tags: Travel MM A Generation in Transition tags: LitSupport MM Never Skip the Pristine Version tags: LitSupport MM A Non-Attendee’s Guide to “Attending” ABA TECHSHOW 2012 tags: LitSupport MM Don’t…

  • | |

    Linked: Gallup: U.S. workers are among the most stressed in the world

    ByMike McBride Reading Time: 2 minutes

    In the end, maybe that’s the take away I would want any manager to have. That each of your employees is an individual, with individual issues in their own lives in and out of work. Don’t assume you know, and don’t assume they are all OK. Consider some of the larger points about how you can contribute in a positive way to support your employees.

    After all, you can either do what you can to help, and keep them with you, or lose them when they realize that the job that does nothing but cause additional stress, with no support, isn’t worth their mental health.

  • |

    Happiness Lab On How Grades And Rewards are Manipulative

    ByMike McBride Reading Time: 4 minutes

    One of the most popular arguments we hear, and one I’ve made myself, is that to truly stay informed, and avoid living in the bubble of our own political bias, we need to make sure we are getting information from a variety of sources, including ones we may not agree with.

    This study seems to be telling us that isn’t enough, and it can easily be manipulated. If I read an opposing viewpoint, and there’s no reward for doing so, I’m unlikely to really be influenced by it, but if I read an opposing viewpoint and get rewarded for it, I’m more likely to change my mind.

    Now, remember that emotional contagion we might get from social media? What if I shared one side of a political view, and got rewarded by the algorithms or whomever with lots of likes and comments, and the post got shared a whole bunch, but posts from the other side, got none of that? Which side am I more likely to agree with? Right, the one that I got better grades on. Not because it’s true, better, or more accurate, but because I am rewarded for thinking that way. Rewarded the way I’ve been my whole life, since I was a little boy, from the first time my parents wanted me to behave a certain way, all the way through my school years, and for all of my career.

    How hard would that be to fight against? Almost impossible, I’d say. How easy would it be for social media to do it, either the companies themselves, or large groups of users?

    How does that influence what we do see on social media?

One Comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)