iPad with Mental Health Matters dispplayed on screen

Linked – People in 20s more likely to be out of work because of poor mental health than those in early 40s

This makes sense and fits with what happened in my life as well.

It was in my 20s when my mental health deteriorated. The impact of that would eventually lead to me not working for a little more than a year. More importantly, though, as this article explains is happening now in the UK, is that those mental health struggles meant I didn’t finish college, didn’t hold down a job where I could learn new skills and advance in my career, and left me behind economically when compared to others in my age bracket.

By the time I was in my 40s, the mental health struggles still existed, but I had learned better coping mechanisms, learned new skills that have helped me advance my career, and have an employment history that shows off my abilities and helps make me employable.

Was I still behind compared to others in my age bracket? Yes. There’s no way to replace the years I lost economically.

I’m 55 now, and I am still behind economically compared to where I could be if I hadn’t spent those years dealing with mental health disasters instead of finishing college and starting my career. I’m not complaining; I do pretty well for myself and am content with where I am. I was one of the lucky ones who had access to some mental health resources and was able to get to this point in my life, which has helped me get to this point in my career. Many people don’t. To me, this is the point of this study:

According to official data, 34% of people aged 18 to 24 reported symptoms of mental disorder, such as depression, anxiety or bipolar disorder in 2021-22.

It is a significant increase on the 2000 figure of 24%, with young women one-and-a-half times more likely to be negatively affected.

“Attention on this issue has tended to focus on higher education, but what should most worry us is when poor mental health comes together with poor education outcomes,” said Louise Murphy, senior economist at the Resolution Foundation.

“The economic consequences of poor mental health are starkest for young people who don’t go to university, with one in three young non-graduates with a common mental disorder currently workless.”

When you’re young and not on the standard education/career path due to mental health, there’s no career history or learned skills to fall back on. I think many employers would view you as unemployable in our current environment. I’m not saying that should be how it is, but it is likely the way it is. My story illustrates the path out of that, but it also contains some privilege. I was able to go to therapy. My family gave me a place to live while I wasn’t working. I had access to learning tools. I had to work hard to create opportunities to learn new skills, but I also found myself in places where I could do that. I had help.

I’m not so sure that many young people have help. That will make it much more difficult for young 20-somethings to look like the young 40-somethings of today in twenty years. With the significant increase in rates of mental health issues in young people these days, it’s imperative that we change some of the ways we do business, first, by providing more support and help to our young workers, and second, by providing opportunity to all young people. We need to move beyond requiring higher education for jobs where the skills necessary don’t meet that level of education. We must have available resources for our workers to get help so they are not left behind. We need those same resources in colleges, high schools, and other educational institutions so that young people can continue their education and that adults can have affordable educational options to continue their education later in life. We need reasonable accommodations and flexibility to allow different types of people to come and work for us.

In short, we need to provide better support and opportunities for everyone. That’s where we start to tackle the mental health epidemic.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/feb/25/people-in-20s-more-likely-out-of-work-because-of-ill-health-than-those-in-early-40s

Similar Posts

  • |

    What I’m Sharing (weekly) Aug 9, 2020

    More Than Half Of Employees Are Afraid To Discuss Their Mental Health With Their Boss, New Data Shows Scientists rename human genes to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates This seems ridiculous, and yet oh so believable. LastPass Checks Dark Web Passwords – You should use a password manager anyway, but this is…

  • What a day!

    It’s System Admin Appreciation Day and in honor of the day, I’m staying home. No, not really, I’m staying home to administer to my own digestive system, which seems to have some corrupt data that needs to be purged, if ya’ know what I mean. *L* It’s also Chris Pirillo’s 29th birthday. Happy birthday you…

  • Why software developers should read this site.

    Ok maybe the title is a little arrogant. Really, what I mean is that there are a ton of blogs out there written by software developers, and read by other software developers. (using all the appropriate jargon to keep out the riff-raff. *smile*.) That’s all well and good, but if you really want to know…

  • |

    Linked: L&D’s Role in Attracting Top Talent

    The folks from this survey understand two things.

    1. The skills they have today won’t be enough to be successful tomorrow. Technology is changing the work we do at an ever-increasing clip. If they are in a job that isn’t keeping pace, or giving them the opportunity to keep pace, it’s going to end badly for them.

    2. If an organization isn’t recognizing the need for their talent to continuously learn it is not only offering a job without the kind of future they are seeking, but it’s probably not offering itself the kind of future it needs. People see this. Your top people know it’s true. They see a sinking ship long before you do. A ship that keeps doing what it’s always done without growing and adapting to change is sinking. Maybe not today, or the next year, but eventually, they know.

  • Quick Thought – Work Culture is So Bad that We Use the Word Quitting to Describe Setting Boundaries.

    They are setting boundaries. They are cutting back on their commitment and engagement with work because they see that work is not the most important thing in life. They make decisions based on their mental health instead of the company’s bottom line.

    No one is leaving their job in this situation. No one is not doing their work. They are simply not taking on extra work and commitments that they aren’t getting paid for.

    Our society’s relationship with work is so skewed that the word we have chosen for this is “quitting”. There’s something profoundly sad about that.

  • |

    Happiness Lab On How Grades And Rewards are Manipulative

    One of the most popular arguments we hear, and one I’ve made myself, is that to truly stay informed, and avoid living in the bubble of our own political bias, we need to make sure we are getting information from a variety of sources, including ones we may not agree with.

    This study seems to be telling us that isn’t enough, and it can easily be manipulated. If I read an opposing viewpoint, and there’s no reward for doing so, I’m unlikely to really be influenced by it, but if I read an opposing viewpoint and get rewarded for it, I’m more likely to change my mind.

    Now, remember that emotional contagion we might get from social media? What if I shared one side of a political view, and got rewarded by the algorithms or whomever with lots of likes and comments, and the post got shared a whole bunch, but posts from the other side, got none of that? Which side am I more likely to agree with? Right, the one that I got better grades on. Not because it’s true, better, or more accurate, but because I am rewarded for thinking that way. Rewarded the way I’ve been my whole life, since I was a little boy, from the first time my parents wanted me to behave a certain way, all the way through my school years, and for all of my career.

    How hard would that be to fight against? Almost impossible, I’d say. How easy would it be for social media to do it, either the companies themselves, or large groups of users?

    How does that influence what we do see on social media?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)