| |

Changing Focus of Legal IT

I was reminded of something I was thinking after that Jeffrey Ritter webinar last week this morning when I stumbled across this post by Jason Plant, Generation Y trainees about to shake up Legal and Legal IT. Specifically it was this quote from Jason that I found interesting.

The struggle of getting the old lawyers to use computers is going to change rapidly into a demand from new lawyers to use the latest computers and software. This I’m sure is starting to happen already, but it will only increase.

What it reminded me of was something that Jeffrey said in response to a question about whether all law firms should be using document review platforms to store and review ediscovery that is received from a client. He went one further, suggesting that any lawyer who doesn’t use Litigation Support tools to handle electronic data more efficiently should probably go ahead and just get out of the Litigation field. There’s no future in it for them.

When I heard him say that, it immediately rang true for me. When I saw Jason’s post, the same thing happened. Lawyers who refuse to learn to use technology have no future, and IT departments who continue to work to try and convince those lawyers to just to use Word, are missing out on opportunities to engage, and provide better tools for, the lawyers who actually have a future.

Now, I’m not saying those older lawyers who simply refuse to use technology are bad lawyers, but I have a hard time imagining that they have much more than a 5 year shelf life, if that. Seriously, I work with ediscovery for a living, and I can’t even imagine any client sticking with an attorney who simply refuses to acknowledge ESI, or if they are forced to acknowledge it, wants it all printed or has no capacity to review documents in more than a page-by-page manner. It simply isn’t efficient. Clients won’t pay for that level of inefficiency, and courts will have no patience for that at all. What kind of practice is this type of lawyer going to have if they haven’t learned how to leverage technology to be more effective by now?

Legal IT, and heck even Litigation Support departments, would be better off engaging the attorneys who do get technology, and who are looking for tools to help them be more effective lawyers. We’ve spent enough time trying to convince those old school lawyers who don’t want the world to change. Let them float along until retirement, or move into something else, because they simply won’t be the lawyers that provide the future client revenue that a firm is going to need. The ones who can provide that client service, and revenue, need more effective tools. This is where the future of law, and of our own career within the industry, lies.

Similar Posts

  • This Week’s Links (weekly)

    The auto post from Diigo seems to be on the fritz today, so I’m adding this weeks links by hand. I apologize for the lack of further formatting. 😉 An Advantage of Former IT in Litigation Support The Basics of How Technology Assisted Review (TAR) Works – and Why Continuo Get Free IT Training with…

  • At least we hope so

    Steven Vore was kind enough to pass along this Computerworld article to me today titled The Help Desk: Often the First Step in a Successful IT Career Couldn’t agree more with that they had to say. There’s no doubt that you get exposed to all kinds of stuff, and definitely have to figure out how…

  • | | |

    Linked – 4 Surprising Benefits of Continuing Education in Litigation Support

    While attorneys are required to stay up-to-date on emerging issues via continuing legal education (CLE) credits, there’s no such requirement dictated for the litigation support profession—unless, of course, you count industry demand. That doesn’t mean formal, ongoing education isn’t important; in fact, our team has learned it makes us more successful in more ways than…

  • | |

    Linked: Ongoing M365 Tenant Upgrades/Migrations

    It’s not normal for us to be using a platform that works one way, then changes and works another way two weeks later, but that is absolutely the way the Agile development is going to happen. The decision to change will be pushed by the business case for making the change, eDiscovery will be a second thought, if a thought at all.

    That means two things in my mind in addition to the things Greg lays out in his post below.

    1. You have to test, test, test. Constantly. You have to stay on top of new features, old feature changes, undocumented changes, etc.

    2. The legal industry as a whole is going to have to get a lot more comfortable with “good faith efforts” being a little more of a gray area as these changes get made. What we could collect easily before, may require a lot more time and effort today, or it may not be possible today because of a bug in a recent update.

    It’s going to happen. Whether you want to talk about M365, Google, cloud document management, cloud review platforms, or even cloud backups. Things will happen beyond our ability to control them, and those things will impact eDiscovery. Are we going to be OK accepting that?

  • Ralph Losey has a New Book – eDiscovery for Everyone

    Just in time for the holiday shopping season, the ABA has a new book by Ralph Losey out all about eDiscovery. I’ll let Ralph describe it himself: As the title suggests, this book is written for everyone with an interest in e-discovery. It is an introductory to intermediate level book. I tried to make it a…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)